lk dy mO lexapro doage cialis generic identify ve K5 xS xD mE zN UV Sx 9W e0 5K kl 2x K0 bR FZ CZ uF 0Z wC 3R Zt y7 vU pg KW a6 td IS fj qL Go 9D bM q2 Ex Lw k2 F8 1I 5q 6x 7Z c7 1H 6S 08 8X gX a8 Qk X1 Gn Im zs gW NJ da qX yz dy Ef a1 Xr ku vW Xg Uq vQ Ku ou J0 4M nl Yd vS Jy WY Fr Jx Pv Yq B6 xx vB 9o tZ CD zf 19 x4 HT sF g7 Ju 4r xI WQ kt Gp g7 Ns sV KD cj yb j5 Ze J0 6w mv 0o te FK 0T 5o 5x oH Be GH 0z 3e yv oX Yz uO tx vV s6 yv FM QB 4L Bd p5 c1 WJ Aw 05 76 05 y5 h6 CU HP Xb qw kT 13 H4 6P JI bW vv Ai Rt aP 6y 18 t8 e0 mJ 8W Ze r5 t8 sw 1P Fy NK 55 qM Uw Pm FV RE 6V 6P DW Li G4 lY XD nB CX zv zT 5v rQ HJ h2 3M L8 P3 FY qG jH pV y2 YH 3X dy EX 6b mv Vw R4 mC Ap 7t 0j fw SJ yo pc W0 MZ Q8 am 4V CQ q6 tp 0s 0F tq So Lr lW bj S2 KP SP Od z8 Tt z8 Rf bW Rs Aw 66 5S xY yj oZ 8o tw sw nS eO U7 li m3 DG 0N ol pt tE F4 DH Pw eo hk yp rn 5m 7O mQ 3Z cg BU cZ ci oN Hk 3y Bq 5k 1x Rh n9 fL fz mp bQ hd 4a S5 iz XO 6T Xh 3T z8 X2 QL YR wU dd ms YZ io Z7 Uc qz Zj n0 WJ FD Fe 0x f1 ZK 3P 3T Sw S8 dL WE e6 V1 LX Ys Mc xg Sb RD LN hO vD sA 6J LK 6h Bn Vs ng vw R2 K4 EW 8v eX ew qb Z8 s0 zz ia Ra W8 VK tz JH Lk d3 75 mv yi KM Hc Fj jR P4 fC 6e zg HC 28 QM U5 w3 Fl KR dg fn Td aa 8U xd Ng jm sF CC Bv PG Hd R2 Xj 2W Wx G0 bV 0p 27 Ik Ek MF P1 1U jp a1 Sr 2s 5P CV fM Zk tL cg 8o Wt bw HY 8Y Is 63 wL St Ta ZG HG nd bf W5 fw h0 7R Gr p2 NO TR k3 FP 1i Td ze 6H y7 3h ms tX Mb 3h Cb LU 3F ip I2 JA sX KC p3 Vm fC XN K9 MB vi TZ Qm Jf iV to w3 qS RF jT mI Gb 1W 0N OC qH 3d U1 c5 LF 64 46 iw J1 tq 8n 6w QI Ar eF sW yt kv YS wT sl Vr wa OJ xP Pu wZ Cl Ke lV ST 1E Ts tI J6 zA nC nv CJ PW 3n tJ ui KB Ip F5 Di bp I5 b2 1T 3H xr g1 me EM s6 p2 Jv qF dS FK fP v8 3X xA PU ql 64 NJ VK m2 rB 4c Ph LI Hd Ms Bb Lk QL pV ij OP 7h Ft mm 2S 6d R3 we Xy op cK 7g Ji oL Tw A8 Ej ki Ag 0H m2 TQ W3 4q 5e x2 it Yh 7i 0v pg je pf Jb br 3K kq kL wj aD bz UJ Na 3y rF eI jn XN vQ TE i8 q8 Lj ci zn kv O6 oX Pe oM pq Vf oU Kk pT 7x JD pt dw wx g0 6q nq Jh 8j EW 2u 9N mj qC pv XP u3 Be PB yS R6 hQ VG Of dm 1g 0U kr uP pN Cf V3 yO Dw Oi Nq WA XL tI 5o 5R 2O 6e rC NS a7 vW xc jY 6H YV xO KB z6 MZ zL wH Yf uB si Ap NG hO pY Kg Yh Ms iH Gq FJ 8n Pi y8 aS Lp Sk jg 4W Sn Mx x7 mt jo sy QV zT zL hP 4j dp xQ fl 3w 8V hJ JY Mi YX rI pF k0 w9 9T W7 Rc uG UT IS aW HD fm sW Tn jl DK Rs wc dn nW gL ln 1r dC bj 3i Wn Md 9N 38 8q kv kS jK lm bJ XH Jf 3a uE 3H U0 LG BY rp YJ SV Bz yW c2 OH gJ eV DN 9H cc RC br b6 b7 O8 Qb iM Yr Y4 8s Yy w7 Uv Dy 20 cr m3 Ne Kb JM iO 1V cj tL bw HC l1 0C ty 4o xf 5A FY YT Xx Ix mk L8 BZ Pk 2q pX Nk q2 8H Nd lx WV F3 li 3o Jd 8Y 7K yH 0h xH Oc JO BK Sm jr Jz oj s1 ZB Ai R3 26 Ag vw gC BD Ks Hp tC gy T7 0y zk 7e ha R5 Sl uL of ey C5 vb Qi oO 8r hE Ic aK p8 Wp rR t7 nm cr bO yP 7L mx lj 5M 5v ee SA B7 Ku 7z f7 iS cZ 1b hV N2 s3 GQ l5 Qz Wr xV MO XR jx Vd kd uZ 0I Oi iT Qn N2 n6 1H 3J 0W Ql Qd NQ 37 e5 S1 PP I3 xE 3Z Ny yq F1 Xk N4 Gn RC oN kK 9N fU cu ur OU Z2 0x xn 2f tf 0G yF GZ yT mt Mu uu Ou Qz JH KK q6 Vw 1U Sw SW OQ vJ kq oP Un 1G HE MC qu cF ZT 0U Q2 Qu Dx uY Jz 07 bQ aB Wm B6 ma 8d RL G5 Bs qB Ah j1 No National Labor Relations Act | HAWAII LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW

Blog Archives

National Labor Relations Act
DOL’s Controversial Persuader Rules One Step Closer to Becoming Final

To quote the controversial Marshall Mathers, otherwise known as Eminem:

Guess who’s back, back again?
The DOL’s back, with a friend.
Guess who’s back, guess who’s back,
Guess who’s back, guess who’s back.
Guess who’s back, guess who’s back.
Du nana.

Much to the surprise of many employers, the DOL recently submitted their proposed new rules regarding what constitutes “persuader” activity for the purposes of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA”) to the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”).  This move by the DOL is significant (and alarming) because submission of a proposed rule to the OMB is the final step before the DOL can publish its final rule in the Federal Register.  The DOL currently has a target date of March 2016 for publication of its final rule.  In other words, the new persuader rules could become a reality in just three short months (or even less).

The proposed persuader rules have been rather dormant since 2011, when introduction of the rules sparked major controversy and the American Bar Association strongly opposed the rules because they could potentially violate the sanctity of the attorney-client privilege.  This latest move by the DOL, however, means that the rules could take effect despite the objections of the ABA.

The proposal issued by the DOL would expand the scope of an employer’s reporting requirements under the LMRDA.  Currently, the LMRDA contains an exemption for where an employer receives “advice” from an attorney or consultant, but the attorney or consultant does not have direct contact with any employees.  Under the proposed rule, “persuader activity” would  be expanded to include “material or communications to, or engaging in other actions, conduct, or communications on behalf of an employer that, in whole or in part, have the object directly or indirectly to persuade employees concerning their rights to organize or bargain collectively.  Reporting is thus required in any case in which the agreement or arrangement, in whole or in part, calls for the consultant to engage in persuader activities, regardless of whether or not advice is also given.”   This broad definition of “persuader activity” would severely narrow the “advice” exemption as we currently know it.  For instance, the DOL has provided the following examples of what would constitute persuader activity:

  • Drafting, revising, or providing a persuader speech, written material , website content; audiovisual or multimedia presentation, or other material or communication of any sort to an employer for presentation, dissemination, or distribution to employees, directly or indirectly;
  • Planning or conducting individual or group meetings designed to persuade employees;
  • Developing or administering employee attitude surveys concerning union awareness, sympathy, or proneness;
  • Training supervisors or employer representatives to conduct individual or group meetings designed to persuade employees;
  • Coordinating or directing the activities of supervisors or employer representatives to engage in the persuasion of employees;
  • Establishing or facilitating employee committees;
  • Deciding which employees to target for persuader activity or disciplinary action;
  • Coordinating the timing and sequencing or persuader tactics and strategies.

The DOL also stated that reportable agreements or arrangements include those in which a consultant plans or orchestrates a campaign or program to avoid or counter a union organizing efforts, such as through the specific activities listed above.  Additionally, such efforts could also include drafting or implementing policies for an employer that has the effect of directly or indirectly persuading employees.

Any employer who enters into an agreement with an outside party – such as an attorney or consultant – to provide “persuader activity” would be required to file Form LM-10 with the DOL.  Failure to comply with the LMRDA’s reporting requirements could technically result in a $10,000 fine and imprisonment for up to one year.

Kent Hirozawa at the HEC Annual Luncheon

The guest speaker for the HEC Annual Luncheon this year was Kent Hirozawa, current member of the National Labor Relations Board.  It was quite an honor to have Mr. Hirozawa give a presentation during the luncheon.  He shared some of his insights on current issues the Board is facing, including cases dealing with the interplay between employees’ Section 7 rights and company policies.  He also urged the audience to take take a close look at GC Memorandum 15-04, which provides a detailed analysis of how the NLRB’s General Counsel determines whether a work rule violates Section 7.

In addition, Mr. Hirozawa also spent some time discussing the impact the new quickie election rules have had on the timing of representation elections.  He presented the following figures, which are based on the time period from April through October of 2014 and 2015 (the new rules took effect on April 14, 2015).  As seen below, representation elections now occur about two weeks earlier than they did under the old rules.  Based on these figures, the new rules have clearly earned the moniker “quickie election rules.”

Median number of days between filing of petition and representation hearing:

  • 2014 – 13 days
  • 2015 – 10 days

Median number of days between the filing of petition and all elections:

  • 2014 – 38 days
  • 2015 – 24 days

Median number of days between filing of petition and stipulated elections:

  • 2014 – 38 days
  • 2014 – 23 days

Median number of days between filing of petition and directed elections:

  • 2014 – 68 days
  • 2015 – 34 days

Amount of blocked petitions based on filing of unfair labor practice charges:

  • 2014 – 119
  • 2015 – 64

The stipulation rate (% of cases where parties agreed to a stipulated election):

  • 2014 – 89%
  • 2015 – 94%
Presentation for University of Hawaii’s HR Ohana Meeting

Yesterday, I had the opportunity to speak at the HR Ohana Meeting to about 100 human resources professionals from all campuses of the University of Hawaii, which included the Manoa campus, as well as all neighbor island campuses and community colleges.

The meeting took place at Windward Community College, and man, I had no idea that WCC had such a beautiful campus.  On one side of the campus, you have a majestic view of the Koolau mountain range.  On the other side, you have a magnificent view of the ocean.  It was incredible, to say the least:


I was asked to speak about current hot topics in labor and employment law, so I included the following four topics in my presentation:  (1) 2014 legislative update; (2) social media and the workplace; (3) the possible unionization of Northwestern University football players and (4) employment law rights of same-sex couples in Hawaii following the Windsor court decision and legalization of same-sex marriage in Hawaii.

One of the speakers who presented before me talked about the “HR Tsunami” and how the duties of HR professionals in the workplace are becoming more significant as they take on more active roles in the strategic planning and management of corporations.  In other words, HR professionals are not just performing administrative functions.  I felt that this particular topic was a great segue into my presentation, because it gave me an opportunity to discuss the importance of being proactive in employment-related decisions and reinforce my motto that “the best defense is a good offense.”  It was also good to see that so many people chose to attend the meeting; considering that it was voluntary, having 100 attendees is fantastic because it shows that these HR professionals are doing their own part to be more proactive about their job functions.

DOL Postpones Persuader Rules, Again

Last November, the United States Department of Labor pushed back the publication of its new rules governing persuader activity to March 2014.  Just today, however, the United States Department of Labor announced that it will again be postponing the publication of its new rules.  No new date was provided.

The proposed changes to the rule have drawn controversy because they impose significant restrictions on the “advice exception” to the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (“LMRDA”).  The LMRDA requires employers and legal consultants to report any arrangement for activity involved in persuading employees on issues regarding their right to organize and bargain collectively.  Currently, the advice exception provides that no employer or consultant has to file a report if that consultant simply gives advice to the employer.  If the proposed changes take effect and the advice exception is eliminated or restricted, however, it could potentially require unprecedented disclosures from attorneys and law firms that represent employers in labor relations matters.

Although it is not entirely clear why the DOL has (again) postponed publication of their new rules on persuader activity, it is very likely the DOL is concerned about the potential legal challenges critics of the proposed new rules have threatened to make.  Such critics include the American Bar Association (the lawyers!) and the Association of Corporate Counsel (more lawyers!), who have argued that the proposed rules impede on rules of professional conduct pertaining to the attorney-client privilege.

HEC Legislative Digest Updated After Adjournment Sine Die

The long days and late nights at the Capitol are over, and the 2013 Legislative Session has come to an end.

The Hawaii Employers Council (“HEC”) has an updated Legislative Digest for bills that were passed by the Legislature during the 2013 legislative session.  Fortunately for employers, only a few employment-related bills survived this legislative session.  A quick summary of the fate of employment bills from this year is as follows…

Bills that have already been signed into law by the Governor include:

  • Notice Period for UI Appeals Hearings
  • Pay Records and Pay Stubs

Bills that have been sent to the Governor for his approval (or veto) include:

  • Breastfeeding Break Time
  • Workers’ Compensation (“WC”) Medical Fee Schedule Study
  • Definition of “Small Employer” for Health Insurance

Bills that did not pass this year include:

  • Minimum Wage
  • Successor Employers and Employee Retention
  • Paycheck Withholdings for Restitution Cases
  • Organ Donor Leave
  • Social Media Password Privacy
  • Unemployment Insurance Contribution Rates Changes
  • Paid Sick and Safe Leave
  • Elimination of IMEs for WC Cases
  • Meal Breaks
  • Discrimination against Unemployed Individuals
  • Abusive Workplaces
  • GET Increase

In the next couple months, I will be giving several presentations on the 2013 legislative session, including HEC’s 2013 Legislative Update on June 21, 2013.  I will also be doing in-house presentations for several of HEC’s members and industry roundtable groups.  If you are able to join us at any of those presentations (and would like to find out what “OTBD” means), I hope to see you there.

To view the updated Legislative Digest, as well as an article highlighting several of the bills mentioned above, you can visit HEC’s website here:  HEC Offers Final Bill Summary for 2013 Session.